
Burglary degrees Minnesota law ranks unauthorized building entry cases from first degree down to fourth degree under Statute 609.582.
The core entry ideas stay related. The ladder then turns on dwellings, weapons, assault, tools, special targets, and the type of intended or completed crime.
Consequently, two files with similar “entry” facts can carry very different exposure. Degree charging is not a minor paperwork detail.
At Wolfgram Law Firm, our Minnesota criminal defense attorneys map the complaint against the statute before anyone assumes the top count is fixed.
Think of burglary degrees Minnesota as a severity ladder, not four unrelated crimes. Each subdivision starts from unauthorized entry, then adds aggravating facts.
Specifically, Minnesota Statute 609.582 sets first-, second-, third-, and fourth-degree theories with different maximum sentences.
Moreover, some open-to-public steal theories appear in the lower degrees after a trespass warning. Those paths have extra conditions.
Importantly, prosecutors may charge the highest degree the facts may support. Defense work often tests whether those aggravators are actually proven.
First degree applies when the person enters a building without consent and with intent to commit a crime, or enters without consent and commits a crime inside.
Additionally, at least one listed aggravator must fit. The building is a dwelling and another person who is not an accomplice is present when the burglar enters or while the burglar is inside.
Alternatively, the burglar possesses a dangerous weapon, an article fashioned to look like one, or an explosive when entering or while inside.
A third path covers assault of a person within the building or on the building’s appurtenant property. That assault theory can raise the case sharply.
A conviction may bring imprisonment for not more than 20 years, a fine of not more than $35,000, or both. Occupied-dwelling first-degree cases also carry a mandatory minimum discussed in our penalties guide.
Second degree still requires unauthorized entry with crime intent, or unauthorized entry plus a crime committed inside. The aggravators then shift.
One common path is that the building is a dwelling. Presence of another person is not required for that dwelling theory under subdivision 2.
Furthermore, forced or threat-of-force entry into a banking or securities-deposit portion of a building can qualify. Forcible entry into a pharmacy or similar controlled-substance storage business can also qualify.
In addition, possessing a tool to gain access to money or property when entering or while inside can support second degree.
A separate paragraph covers government buildings, religious establishments, historic property, or school buildings when the intent or completed crime is theft or criminal damage under the listed statutes.
A second-degree conviction may bring imprisonment for not more than ten years, a fine of not more than $20,000, or both.
Except as otherwise provided, third degree covers unauthorized entry with intent to steal or to commit any felony or gross misdemeanor while inside.
It also covers unauthorized entry plus stealing or committing a felony or gross misdemeanor while inside. Accomplice liability can apply here as well.
A conviction may bring imprisonment for not more than five years, a fine of not more than $10,000, or both.
However, open-to-public buildings have a special steal theory outside certain subdivision 2(b) buildings. Entry within one year after being told to leave and not return can matter.
That open-public third-degree path also requires a qualifying prior conviction within five years and a felony-level sentence history as the statute describes. Counsel should verify each condition carefully.
Fourth degree covers unauthorized entry with intent to commit a misdemeanor other than to steal. It also covers unauthorized entry plus committing such a misdemeanor inside.
Therefore, the intended crime type can decide whether the file sits in third or fourth degree. Steal, felony, and gross misdemeanor theories generally sit higher.
A fourth-degree conviction may bring imprisonment for not more than 364 days, a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.
Additionally, another open-to-public steal theory appears here when the person enters within one year after a leave-and-not-return warning. That path does not add the same prior-conviction package as the third-degree open-public rule.
As a result, warning records, store bans, and prior dates can become central evidence. Keep those papers for your lawyer.
Police reports may emphasize broken locks, occupied status, tools, or weapons. Prosecutors then match those claims to a subdivision.
However, contested facts can move a case down the ladder. A dwelling dispute, tool characterization fight, or consent issue can change exposure.
Furthermore, assault-related first-degree theories can overlap with separate assault charging. Defense strategy should address both tracks.
In Twin Cities counties, charging habits can differ. Still, the statute text remains the measuring stick for every degree label.
Consequently, early review should test presence claims, weapon claims, and the exact crime intended or completed. Those details drive the ladder.
Body-worn camera clips and 911 audio can also clarify whether force, threat, or assault language fits. Therefore, ask counsel to preserve that media early.
In addition, lease language and guest policies can help dwelling and consent analysis. Bring those papers to the first meeting.
Moreover, identification and accomplice claims need separate scrutiny. Degree fights mean little if the wrong person was charged.
Do not assume a reduced degree is automatic after negotiation. The state may still push the highest count the complaint supports.
Weapon look-alike claims can be especially fact-heavy. Lighting, photos, and witness distance may all matter.
Additionally, pharmacy and bank force theories turn on where the person entered inside the building. A lobby dispute is not always the same as a vault or pharmacy area entry.
School, government, religious, and historic-property second-degree paths also require matching the intended or completed crime to theft or damage statutes. Wrong matching can overstate the degree.
Therefore, ask counsel to walk through each degree element against the discovery. A chart of claimed facts versus proof gaps can clarify leverage.
Burglary degrees Minnesota charging can also change after lab results, witness interviews, or amended complaints. Recheck the degree before any plea talk.
If you are sorting burglary degrees Minnesota exposure after an arrest or complaint, do not wait for the next hearing to get a clear map. Early statute matching can change strategy.
Wolfgram Law Firm offers a free consultation for Minnesota criminal defense matters. Contact us today through our contact page or call the office to talk through your options.
Does an empty house still support second-degree dwelling burglary?
It may. Subdivision 2 includes a dwelling pathway that does not require another person’s presence.
Presence becomes critical for certain first-degree occupied-dwelling theories instead.
What separates third-degree and fourth-degree burglary?
Third degree generally involves intent to steal or to commit a felony or gross misdemeanor, or completing those crimes after unauthorized entry.
Fourth degree generally involves a misdemeanor other than steal.
Can tools alone raise a burglary to second degree?
They can, if the person possesses a tool to gain access to money or property when entering or while in the building, and the other second-degree elements are met.
Counsel should still challenge what the object was and how it was used.
This article is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Every criminal case is unique. If you need legal advice regarding your specific situation, consult our experienced Minnesota criminal defense attorney.